Research & Writing

Chad
Lickfelt

International Relations student at Florida International University, writing on humanitarian policy, disability-inclusive humanitarian action, Sudanese and African politics, and democratic erosion.

Humanitarian Policy Sudan & Africa Disability Inclusion Democratic Erosion FIU — B.A. I.R.

Where I work and why it matters

I am an undergraduate studying International Relations at Florida International University. My work sits at the intersection of humanitarian policy, political analysis, and disability inclusion: how states fail their people, how informal systems fill the gaps, how the institutions meant to respond actually behave, and what happens to the people with disabilities who are most affected when they fail.

That last question is not an afterthought. People with disabilities face some of the highest risks in any crisis and are often the last consideration in its response. Making humanitarian action genuinely inclusive is a central thread of my work, reflected in my current certification track in disability-inclusive disaster risk reduction alongside core humanitarian standards.

Institutional details most people find boring are where political power actually lives, and someone should be paying attention to them.

I am also focused on Sudan, where informal economic networks sustained communities through a decade of crisis, and on democratic erosion, which I track through a structured indicator framework of my own design. I aim to work in humanitarian policy with international organizations.

Independent projects

Parallel Economies: The Resilience of Sudan’s Informal Economic Systems During Humanitarian Intervention, 1983–1993

Completed

Independent research paper · Fall 2025 · History & political economy

An examination of how hawala remittance networks, sanduk savings associations, and suq markets functioned as parallel economic infrastructure during a decade of war, famine, and state contraction. The paper argues that these informal systems were not stopgaps but durable institutions, with direct implications for how humanitarian actors should engage local economies in protracted crises.

Read the full paper (PDF)

Democratic Erosion Observatory

Ongoing

Quarterly monitoring index · Est. 2026 · Q3 2026 scoring in progress

A source-backed longitudinal index scoring democratic erosion each quarter across an eight-country comparative frame, using six indicators on a 0–4 rubric: electoral integrity, judicial independence, executive constraint, civil society space, press and media freedom, and the chilling effect of self-censorship. Every score is tied to a written rationale, a rubric cell, and a source library, with de-confliction, quiescence, and saturation rules to keep scores comparable across countries and cycles.

Q2 2026 · latest complete cycle · higher means more erosion

CountryCompositeElect.Judic.Exec.CivilPressChill.
Poland1.17121111
United States2.33222233
Hungary2.33232331
Turkey3.00333333
Russia4.00444444

Columns: electoral integrity, judicial independence, executive constraint, civil society space, press and media freedom, chilling effect. Composite is the unweighted mean of the six. Russia anchors the top of the scale as a closed-autocracy ceiling case. India, Serbia, and Slovakia are in the frame but not yet scored.

Get in touch

The best way to reach me is by email. I am genuinely eager to discuss my work on Sudan, disability inclusion in crisis situations, or anything in the humanitarian sector.